Back to Blogging: Barnier and Boris

I have begun to draft a prolonged 'Thinkpiece', and am already thinking that it is probably going to be too wordy for the normal blog format. I'll press on with it for a few days, but in the meantime I intend to carry on blogging most days in simple, short dollops. It seems to suit my temperament.

This morning, the radio brought me the shocking early gossip that David Davis - the Brexit Secretary who has made such heavy weather of a simple job, so far - has suggested that in the summer of 2019 he will retire and leave to Boris Johnson the task of implementing whatever Brexit deal the UK ends up with at the March deadline. The one reassuring thought to which this gives rise is that it is probably Johnson's destiny to lead the Tory party to a defeat of greater proportions than that of 1945.

The prospect of two dangerous Marxists leading a cosmetically-rational Labour majority in the Commons down a road to ruin is not enough to scare anybody sensible into voting for Boris, who seems anxious to display his complete failure to understand either the crazy orthodox Economics of the 'free market' school or the realities of economic existence. I have not heard his comment on the scandal of the botched roll-out of the Single Benefit, and suspect that he has not made one. I don't suppose that he would understand even as little as does the Prime Minister of the situation of people who are faced with the prospect of having no income for an average period of six weeks. Most Conservative MPs seem mollified by the assurance that these desperate individuals can get a loan of half the level of benefit that they can expect ultimately to get, on strict payback terms. So little do most recipients trust the system to treat them fairly that they suspect that if they took up the offer of the loan they would be under even more intense scrutiny than they already have been. The disconnect between the 'hard Brexiteer' minority in the Commons and the grassroots of the electorate - including traditional Tory voters - has become greater than one could have forecast even a year ago.

In the 2017 General Election Mrs May got a greater Conservative vote than did her predecessor in either 2010 or 2015: but that did not translate into a majority of Commons seats: just as happened when Hillary Clinton's three million vote lead in the election failed to translate into Electoral College votes in the USA. Mrs May's largely zombie-like performance since her wining defeat is comprehensible, but it is desperately bad for the country. Her most egregious error was to hire a hall in Florence in which to make a statement to some of her ministers and to the British press [and a handful of local Italian politicians] that she should have made in more precise terms to the House of Commons six months earlier. That would have obviated the 'need' for any election in the UK, and made it possible for M Barnier to say: "Ah, now I begin to understand where she is coming from: let's start the serious talking."

Mrs May could, possibly, have been a competent prime minister: had she possessed the one essential quality that she conspicuously lacks: confidence in her own instincts. This seems increasingly to be derived from the circumstances of her upbringing an early career. A nice home in the home counties, a nice school in the home counties, an easy passage into an easy degree at a top university, a comfortable partnership with a slightly younger man, a job in the Bank of England and an easy passage to a safe parliamentary seat. There has been no need in that life to struggle: no hardship; not even experience of work in a competitive business: and how all that now shows!

The same goes for Boris, of course; his troubles have come from his lies and his lusts. Jeremy Corbyn's origins in the family manor house and his career on the champagne socialist circuit have kept him carefully isolated from the harsh realities of life. Here we have three of a kind; and there are more of their kind all around.

It is good to have practical builders like Philip Hammond and successful competitive investment managers like the egregious Mr Mogg to bring balance to our political life!